Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry- America Fixture: The Business Behind the Baltimore Rugby Bonanza
The Springboks may have travelled to Baltimore to finish a rugby series, but South African Rugby and New Zealand Rugby were also chasing something else: American dollars.
When the Springboks defeated the All Blacks 43–28 at M&T Bank Stadium on 12 September 2026, they completed a 3–1 series victory and brought Rugby’s Greatest Rivalry to a spectacular conclusion.
But away from the six South African tries and the drama on the field, the Baltimore Test represented something potentially more important for the future of international rugby — a real-world experiment in whether rugby’s biggest fixtures can generate significant commercial returns in the United States. (Reuters)
The $8 million question
Before the match, reports indicated that the Springboks and All Blacks could collectively make approximately US$8 million more by staging the final Test in Baltimore than they would have generated by playing it in South Africa. AFP reported that the two unions expected to share an estimated $8 million additional financial return from taking the fixture to the United States. (Sunday Independent) Other reports produced slightly different estimates.
Daily Maverick reported that South African Rugby and New Zealand Rugby could each earn roughly R90 million more from the Baltimore fixture than they would have in South Africa, while ESPN reported suggestions that each union could bank around US$9 million more. The differences demonstrate an important point about sports finance: projections can vary depending on whether they include promoter fees, World Rugby incentives, sponsorship, hospitality and other commercial income. (Daily Maverick)
So, did Baltimore actually generate that money?
We don't know yet.
As of 14 September 2026, SA Rugby and New Zealand Rugby have not publicly released the audited final revenue figure for the match. Daily Maverick reported that the actual income figures for the Greatest Rivalry tour are expected to become available through the unions' 2026 financial statements next year. (Daily Maverick)
That distinction is important. It would be inaccurate to report the $8 million projection as the actual profit or revenue generated.
68,173 fans and a serious American audience
What we do know is that Baltimore delivered an impressive crowd.
68,173 spectators attended the match at M&T Bank Stadium, the home of the NFL's Baltimore Ravens. Reuters described the fixture as a "money-spinning exercise" for both unions. (Reuters)
Pre-match reporting suggested average ticket prices of approximately US$200. If that average price were applied across the reported attendance, the theoretical gross ticket value would be around US$13.6 million.
That is not an official revenue figure — and it should not be confused with the amount ultimately received by the unions. Stadium costs, promoter arrangements, taxes, ticketing fees, hospitality, complimentary tickets and revenue-sharing agreements all affect the final number.
But it illustrates the commercial opportunity.
A 68,000-plus crowd paying premium American sports prices for international rugby is a very different economic proposition from a traditional Test match.
Why America matters
The bigger opportunity isn't necessarily one Baltimore Test.
It is what happens after Baltimore.
The United States is preparing to host the men's Rugby World Cup in 2031 and the women's Rugby World Cup in 2033. World Rugby has committed to investing £200 million in the US market over the next six years as part of its strategy to build the sport ahead of those tournaments. (Daily Maverick) That creates several potential revenue streams.
Broadcasting could eventually become enormous if rugby develops a meaningful American television and streaming audience.
Sponsorship is another major opportunity. The Springboks already have globally recognised commercial partners, while SA Rugby CEO Rian Oberholzer said sponsors including Nike and Coca-Cola see the United States as an important market. (Sunday Independent)
Then there is hospitality.
Imagine a Springboks–All Blacks weekend in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago or Miami featuring corporate dinners, former-player appearances, premium hospitality, merchandise launches and business networking events. That becomes more than a rugby match. It becomes a sports-entertainment property.
There is also a sizeable South African diaspora in America. SA Rugby estimates between 150,000 and 180,000 South Africans live in the United States, providing a natural starting point for growing the Springbok fanbase beyond the expatriate community. (Sunday Independent)
Could private equity come knocking again?
This is perhaps the most fascinating business question.
SA Rugby has already experienced a private-equity approach. In 2024, US-based Ackerley Sports Group proposed investing US$75 million for a 20% stake in a commercial-rights company connected to the Springbok business. The proposal ultimately failed to secure the required support from South African rugby unions. (Reuters)
But the Baltimore experiment could make the Springbok commercial proposition even more interesting to investors.
SA Rugby generated approximately R2.02 billion in group revenue in 2025, while sponsorship revenue reached R739 million and broadcast revenue R678 million, according to Daily Maverick's analysis of the union's financials. (Daily Maverick)
Now add an expanding international strategy, a powerful global brand, two World Cups approaching in the US and growing evidence that Springbok–All Blacks matches can command premium economics overseas.
That is exactly the type of growth story private capital tends to notice.
I wouldn't be surprised if another investor eventually explores a minority stake in the commercial rights surrounding the Springbok brand. However, that is speculation, not a report of a current deal. SA Rugby has previously emphasised that the Springboks themselves are a national institution and are not simply an asset to be transferred to private equity. (Springboks Rugby)
The more realistic model would therefore be investment in commercial rights, media, sponsorship, merchandising and international expansion — rather than "buying the Springboks."
The real victory may be off the field
The Springboks won the Baltimore Test 43–28.
But commercially, the result may take several years to measure.
If Baltimore proves that rugby's biggest rivalries can attract American audiences, premium ticket prices, global sponsors and substantial media attention, then the match could become a template for future international rugby.
The Springboks and All Blacks didn't just take their rivalry to America.
They took rugby's business model with them.
And if the numbers eventually justify the gamble, Baltimore may be remembered as one of the moments when international rugby seriously began looking at America not simply as a future Rugby World Cup host — but as one of its most important commercial markets.
Sources
Reuters – Springboks beat All Blacks again to clinch tour series
ESPN – Why the Springboks and All Blacks battled it out in Baltimore
AFP / Sunday Independent – Springboks and All Blacks to share estimated $8m Baltimore windfall
Daily Maverick – The money game: why the Springboks and All Blacks played in Baltimore
Comments